Best for: Finding a relationship in your 20s and 30s
- Detailed, conversation-friendly profiles
- Strong focus on real relationships
- Free version is usable, with free faith and ethnicity filters
- Free version
- Yes
- Paid from
- ≈ $16.99 (US App Store)
Comparison
Match suits serious daters over 30 with strong search; Zoosk is more flexible and often cheaper, with a mix of swiping and browsing.
Quick verdict
Match wins overall for most people. Choose Match if you want a serious, mature community. Choose Zoosk if you want flexibility and a lower price.
| Feature | Match | Zoosk |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 4.2 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Best for | Serious daters who like to search | Casual to serious dating on a budget |
| Audience | 18+, mostly 30–60; members must be single or separated | 18+, broad ages; US, Canada and Australia only |
| Typical goal | Relationships | Dating and relationships |
| Free version | Yes | Limited |
| Paid from | ≈ $19.99 (US App Store) | ≈ $29.99 (US App Store) |
| Platforms | iOS, Android, Web | iOS, Android, Web |
| Matching style | Search + daily matches | SmartPick suggestions + Carousel |
| Extra costs | Optional add-ons and Boosts | Optional Boosts and Premium Messaging |
Match
Zoosk
Match paid plans start at ≈ $19.99 (US App Store); Zoosk paid plans start at ≈ $29.99 (US App Store). Prices vary by country and plan length — see Match pricing and Zoosk pricing.
Best for: Finding a relationship in your 20s and 30s
Best for: Serious relationships and marriage
Match generally has a more serious community; Zoosk is a good cheaper alternative.