Best for: Women who want more control
- Less unwanted messaging for women
- Relationship-minded user base
- Strong verification and safety features
- Free version
- Yes
- Paid from
- ≈ $15/mo
Comparison
Both are long-running free dating sites where you can message without paying. POF is broader and search-led; OkCupid matches you on answers to questions, which makes conversations easier to start.
Quick verdict
OkCupid wins overall for most people. Choose Plenty of Fish if you want the broadest free pool and like searching profiles yourself. Choose OkCupid if you care about values and want a match percentage to guide you.
| Feature | Plenty of Fish | OkCupid |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 3.6 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Best for | Free messaging and searching a big pool yourself | Matching on values and answers, not just photos |
| Audience | Broad ages, roughly 25–55; very popular in Canada, the US and the UK | Mostly 20–40; strong in cities and among LGBTQ+ daters |
| Typical goal | Casual dating to relationships | Dating and relationships |
| Free version | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | ≈ $10/mo | ≈ $10/mo |
| Platforms | iOS, Android, Web | iOS, Android, Web |
| How matching works | Search, browse and Meet Me | Matching questions and match percentage |
| Free messaging | Yes | Yes, with matches |
| Paid tiers | Plus, Premium, Prestige | Basic, Premium (+ Incognito) |
Plenty of Fish
OkCupid
Read our full Plenty of Fish review →
Plenty of Fish paid plans start at ≈ $10/mo; OkCupid paid plans start at ≈ $10/mo. Prices vary by country and plan length — see Plenty of Fish pricing and OkCupid pricing.
Best for: Women who want more control
Best for: Finding a relationship in your 20s and 30s
OkCupid usually works better for relationships because its questions surface shared values; POF has more people but more mixed intentions.
Yes — both are part of Match Group, alongside Tinder and Hinge.